|
| Back |
10 Tips for Communicating Change
While organizational change requires more than 10 tips, here are 10 key
things to keep in mind when planning, announcing, implementing, and
communicating a change initiative:
-
Remember that there's
no one perfect way to communicate change.
Change is uncomfortable,
and adapting to change is messy. The perfect Gantt chart does not a painless
change experience make. Why? Because tasks are easy to list, but behavior
and long-held habits are not easy to change. Gather outside information,
solicit perspectives, and adapt the approaches for your organization and
group.
-
Start by asking
yourself what exactly is changing and why.
Too many programs are
heavy on the jargon and light on the substance of what the buzz phrases mean
in the day-to-day reality of the organization' s people. You have to make
that link. For example, what does it mean when you say the organization
needs to be more responsive? What behaviors characterize a so-called flat
organization? Go to the root of what you're trying to achieve from an
organizational behavior perspective, and give the jargon life.
-
Know what results you
want, ideally, from both the change initiative and the communication program
or tactic.
What's the call to action for the communication program?
What's the call to action for the specific communication tactic? What
systemic or operations changes are under way that provide the framework for
the desired results and behaviors?
-
Include communication
strategists at the very beginning of the discussions about the change, on
the strategic team from the start.
Too often, qualified
communicators are involved after backlash is in full force, when the leaks
and rumor mills are rampant. The corporate lawyer or the MBA with one or two
classes in PowerPoint is not qualified to understand how the people of the
organization will respond to change and what information they'll need. Their
particular expertise is most likely legal requirement and cost cutting, not
communication.
-
Share information with
employees as soon as possible.
There's a real dilemma in public
companies, where investor communication is a priority and employees hear
about a merger or reorganization on their car radio while commuting to work.
Once fear and insecurity are heightened, you waste a lot of time getting
back to a place of order, understanding, and productivity, and many people
head for their desks to update résumés and to call employment recruiters.
-
Keep in mind that
quantity is fine, but quality and consistency are crucial.
Most
CEOs and managers are quoted as saying, "You can't communicate too
much," but you can communicate too much insignificant or insensitive
information. You can't communicate too much significant, substantial
information.
-
Longevity.
Remember that a change effort starts with the announcement or a merger or
change initiative. Many leaders and managers underestimate the length of
time required by a change cycle. That's why numerous reports indicate poor
performance following many IPOs, mergers, change initiatives, etc. Just as
Rome wasn't built in a day, neither do people and organizations change in a
week, or even a year. Think of it as changing some very ingrained habits;
that's what you're doing.
-
Remember to use a
variety of communication pathways and vehicles.
Some organizations
make an enormous mistake in using only one vehicle, such as e-mail or the
company intranet site. Redundancy and repetition are helpful in creating an
effective communication program.
-
Don't confuse process
-- visioning, chartering change teams, planning, endless PowerPoint
presentations -- with communication.
While those meetings and
processes can be communication vehicles if designed mindfully and handled in
the context of a broader program, they aren't adequate to meet change
communication needs.
-
Give people multiple
opportunities to share concerns, ask questions, and offer ideas, and make
following up with answers and updates a top priority.
The more
people are involved in the process, the fewer you'll have walking out the
door or worse, staying and acting as internal saboteurs.
|